iB::Topic::Re: wine; Glibc-NPTL, possible?

	Damn Small Linux :: Damn Small Linux Board The DSL Forums

» Welcome Guest
[ Log In :: Register ]

Damn Small Linux Board » Damn Small Linux » DSL Ideas and Suggestions » Re: wine; Glibc-NPTL, possible?

		Mini-ITX Boards Sale, Fanless BareBones Mini-ITX, Bootable 1G DSL USBs, 533MHz Fanless PC <-- SALE $200 each!
		Get The Official Damn Small Linux Book. DSL Market , Great VPS hosting provided by Tektonic

[ Track this topic :: Email this topic :: Print this topic ]

Topic: Re: wine; Glibc-NPTL, possible?, May fix instability of wine on DSL

< Next Oldest | Next Newest >

stupid_idiot Offline

Group: Members
Posts: 344
Joined: Oct. 2006

Posted: July 22 2007,12:07

Code Sample

wine: glibc >= 2.3 without NPTL or TLS is not a supported combination.
It will most likely crash. Please upgrade to a glibc with NPTL support.

I do not think this warning is benign - i.e. It affects the running of certain apps, seriously.

Tested with WINE versions:
0.9.37 (1 month ago)
0.9.41 (Just today)

So far, I have only one clear example:
Mozilla Firefox 2.0.0.3 win32
WINE on Debian Sid (Glibc 2.5 with NPTL): Runs fine, to the extent that Flash Player 9 installs and plays Flash videos (youtube.com) successfully.
WINE on DSL (Glibc 2.3.2 without NPTL): Timeout with all sites.

We can see Glibc's configuration by running (literally):
`/lib/libc.so.6`

Debian Sid:
GNU C Library stable release version 2.5, by Roland McGrath et al.
Copyright © 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.
There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A
PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Compiled by GNU CC version 4.1.3 20070601 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.2-12).
Compiled on a Linux >>2.6.20.11<< system on 2007-06-13.
Available extensions:
crypt add-on version 2.1 by Michael Glad and others
GNU Libidn by Simon Josefsson
GNU libio by Per Bothner
NIS(YP)/NIS+ NSS modules 0.19 by Thorsten Kukuk
Native POSIX Threads Library by Ulrich Drepper et al
BIND-8.2.3-T5B
Thread-local storage support included.
For bug reporting instructions, please see:
<http://www.gnu.org/software/libc/bugs.html>.

DSL:
GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.2, by Roland McGrath et al.
Copyright © 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.
There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A
PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Compiled by GNU CC version 3.3.2 20030831 (Debian prerelease).
Compiled on a Linux 2.4.19 system on 2003-09-12.
Available extensions:
GNU libio by Per Bothner
crypt add-on version 2.1 by Michael Glad and others
linuxthreads-0.10 by Xavier Leroy
BIND-8.2.3-T5B
libthread_db work sponsored by Alpha Processor Inc
NIS(YP)/NIS+ NSS modules 0.19 by Thorsten Kukuk
Report bugs using the `glibcbug' script to <[email protected]>.

curaga

Group: Members
Posts: 2163
Joined: Feb. 2007

Posted: July 22 2007,14:17

NPTL needs a 2.6 kernel (compiled with at least gcc 3), no way around that..

--------------
There's no such thing as life. Those mean little jocks invented it ;)
-
Windows is not a virus. A virus does something!

stupid_idiot Offline

Group: Members
Posts: 344
Joined: Oct. 2006

Posted: July 23 2007,23:02

I've seen RHEL kernels with version strings such as '2.4.2x-blabla-nptl' so from this I gather that NPTL on kernel 2.4 is at least possible in RHEL. I don't know whether NPTL support is in the mainline kernel - is it supported in the latest 2.4.34?

jpeters

Group: Members
Posts: 804
Joined: April 2006

Posted: July 24 2007,01:15

Quote (stupid_idiot @ July 22 2007,08:07)

Code Sample

wine: glibc >= 2.3 without NPTL or TLS is not a supported combination.
It will most likely crash. Please upgrade to a glibc with NPTL support.

I do not think this warning is benign - i.e. It affects the running of certain apps, seriously.

I was wondering about this myself, when I tried out wine0.9.4x.uci that you submitted, and went looking around for some way to get an updated glibc with NPTL somewhere. I just read that NPTL wasn't supported before 2.6 (wiki), as Curaga noted.

curaga

Group: Members
Posts: 2163
Joined: Feb. 2007

Posted: July 24 2007,05:43

Well, Redhat kernels are very far from vanilla ones.. They patch and backport them so much it would actually be stabler to use newer vanilla ones..

--------------
There's no such thing as life. Those mean little jocks invented it ;)
-
Windows is not a virus. A virus does something!

4 replies since July 22 2007,12:07

< Next Oldest | Next Newest >

[ Track this topic :: Email this topic :: Print this topic ]

Damn Small Linux Board » Damn Small Linux » DSL Ideas and Suggestions » Re: wine; Glibc-NPTL, possible?